Thanks Ken, I will. 150 or 300 is a bit high.

Barber, Kenneth L. wrote:

> i think 100 was a fluke. if we want to set it up some, set it back down
> after the discussion quites down.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: greer.bobby [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 9:00 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Message volume
>
> Carla,
>
>         300 seems a bit high to me. We have people complaining about volume
> now. However, I will go along with what the people of the list want as well
> as
> the feasibility of such a high number from a systems viewpoint (Ken, Kyle,
> Deri, help me out here).
>
> Bobby
>
> Carla MacInnis wrote:
>
> > Looks like treatment alternatives and aging is a hot topic. Set the limit
> to
> > 300 :)
> >
> > "Bobby G. Greer" wrote:
> >
> > > For the first time since I have been one of the list managers, we
> recived
> > > notice last night that we had exceeded our alloted100 messages in one
> day.
> > >
> > > Deri,
> > >
> > >     I set it to 150. do we need to reset it back to 100 at some point?
> > >
> > > Bobby