C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Meir Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
Date:
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:52:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
Why does a psychic need to ask you ANYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ROTFL

M

-----Original Message-----
From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Barber, Kenneth L.
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 08:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A Request


Why do telephone phycics have to ask your name?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A Request

Smart, yes, logical, yes, but psychic, no.  I can't read minds. I don't
believe in psychics anyway and I don't believe in Cleo (who is a
"psychic" charged with fraud in the state of Florida).

And I certainly hope I'm not psychotic!  LOL

Kat

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:09:50 -0400 "Barber, Kenneth L." <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> I THOUGHT YOU WE PSYCHIC   or is that
> psycotic..  oh, these type terms do so
> confuse me.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salkin Kathleen
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:09 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: A Request
>
> Hello all,
>
> I've got a request.  I realise it's
> 'netiquette' to cut quotes of earlier
> messages to a minimum whilst replying, and
> that's all to the good, but I
> don't think it's necessary to cut out the
> entire original message.  Please
> leave something in so one can realise just what
> you're talking about.  We
> get so many messages on this list and so many
> responses without changing the
> subject line, I can waste time going back
> through the messages trying to
> find the one replying to so that it makes
> sense.
>
> As I said, you don't have to leave the entire
> message you're replying to,
> just the part that's pertinent.
>
> Thanks!  You'd save me time and my sanity!
>
> Kat  (who's very glad it's Friday)
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2