Bush seems very good at covering his tracks but I have to have hope
so I am hopeful Americans wake up and that the Democrats in office
find their backbone.
At 12:14 PM 4/7/2006, you wrote:
>...and in order for Congress to impeach Bush, the Democrats would need
>to be in control, which isn't likely unless some real bombshells come
>out of the Libby trial, which will be delayed until after the 2006
>elections, IMHO.=20
>
>Kendall=20
>
>An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's redundant!)
>
>The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
>persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all
>progress depends on the unreasonable man.
>
>-George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kathleen Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:43 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: article...
>
>I don't like him any more than you do, Anthony, and I would love to =20
>see him get impeached but to be scrupulously fair, I need to see =20
>evidence.
>
>I also think what they did to Bill Clinton was horrible and I think =20
>turnabout would be fair play, but I don't see it happening. He's too =20
>wily.
>
>Kat
>
>On 6 Apr 2006, at 18:39, Anthony Arnold wrote:
>
>I have given up on hope that Bush and Chaney are going to be removed, =20
>so we
>better live through the next 3 years and promise ourselves that the =20
>mistakes
>made won't be repeated. Being in a red state where majority =20
>appreciate what
>Bush and Chaney are doing for everyone of us, I'm just amazed that =20
>people
>aren't willing to smell the roses.
>
>Thanks,
>Anthony
>Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cerebral Palsy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On =20
>Behalf Of
>Kathleen Salkin
>Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:06 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: article...
>
>If this is true, this is shocking...but before going all half-cocked,
>do consider the source. This guy is under criminal investigation and
>is probably naming names to cut a deal. Until I see an indictment
>for Bush come out, I'm going to be sceptical.
>
>I loathe Bush, but he is innocent until proven guilty.
>
>Kat
>
>
>On 6 Apr 2006, at 17:03, Mike Collis wrote:
>
>I was willing to give Bush the benefit of the doubt...
>
>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12187153/ but if this is true, it raises
>danger
>signals...
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3Dc-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
