The evidence in Ohio is pretty good. The head of elections promised 
to win it for Bush and they delivered. That information is pretty 
widely out. I demanded a hand count of my ballot and refused to use 
the machine. Humans can make errors also but when the exit polls and 
the count are way off that is a red flag. And then there was the 
widespread lack of access to voting in strongly democratic districts 
where they expected a strong turnout but gave few resources and 
people had to wait 12 hours to vote. Not too many people can do that.

At 02:58 AM 10/20/2006, you wrote:
>Do you have definite proof that this was deliberate sabotage and not
>machine error?  I work with computers and can tell you that computers
>are literal machines operating on boolean principles and it's awfully
>easy for machines to interpret input wrongly.  I used a voting
>machine in the last Presidential election and recall that it would
>have been all to easy for someone not familiar with computers to make
>mistakes.
>
>I remember I was so angry at the results the day after the 2004
>elections that I actually took it out on some poor old soul for
>taking the last handicapped parking space at at doctor's office and
>swore at him.  I'm still angry but am determined that we Dems will
>win back the White House in 2008 (I have no hope of any Dems winning
>the local races as this area is pretty much Republican and the local
>Republican running for Congress would be a newcomer to Congress and
>therefore not associated with present scandals or national issues).
>
>Kat
>
>
>On 20 Oct 2006, at 02:05, Linda Walker wrote:
>
>Dems could win and the voting machines could switch it to the Reps.
>It's happened before and there are now more of these machines in
>place than ever.
>
>At 08:30 PM 10/19/2006, you wrote:
> > i did not really post this to start a thread, it is
> > okay if it does, i just really wanted you all to read
> > it. if the polls are right, the left is going to
> > control the congress soon. i just wanted you all to
> > recogize what was happening when it happens later on.
> >
> > --- ken barber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > >  And oh, btw,
> > > > Habeus Corpus is now a thing of the past.  We'll
> > > all
> > > > need to mind our P's and Q's now!
> > >
> > >
> > > do you support giving constitutional rights to
> > > non-citizen terrorist mike? did you ever even learn
> > > the preamble. it starts out "We the people of the
> > > UNITED STATES..." Do you think the mastermind of the
> > > 9-11 attack deserves to have constitutional rights
> > > confered on him?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > habeou corpus is a constitutional right to U.S.
> > > Citizens.
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > -----------------------
> > >
> > > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> > > list, go here:
> > >
> > >
> > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
> >
> > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy