C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Barber, Kenneth L." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
Date:
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:04:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
That is what I am getting at. These people who give these people money
should just think about it a little.


By the way, you get the animation?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:01 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: A Request

A very good question!  And very suspicious. In fact, why do they have to ask
you questions anyway?  And if they have to ask you for your credit card
number, why, they're not psychic at all!

Kat


On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 08:36:15 -0400 "Barber, Kenneth L." <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Why do telephone phycics have to ask your name?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathy Salkin
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:17 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: A Request
>
> Smart, yes, logical, yes, but psychic, no.  I
> can't read minds. I don't
> believe in psychics anyway and I don't believe
> in Cleo (who is a "psychic"
> charged with fraud in the state of Florida).
>
> And I certainly hope I'm not psychotic!  LOL
>
> Kat
>
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 07:09:50 -0400 "Barber,
> Kenneth L."
> wrote:
>
> > I THOUGHT YOU WE PSYCHIC   or is that
> > psycotic..  oh, these type terms do so
> > confuse me.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Salkin Kathleen
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:09 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: A Request
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've got a request.  I realise it's
> > 'netiquette' to cut quotes of earlier
> > messages to a minimum whilst replying, and
> > that's all to the good, but I
> > don't think it's necessary to cut out the
> > entire original message.  Please
> > leave something in so one can realise just
> what
> > you're talking about.  We
> > get so many messages on this list and so many
> > responses without changing the
> > subject line, I can waste time going back
> > through the messages trying to
> > find the one replying to so that it makes
> > sense.
> >
> > As I said, you don't have to leave the entire
> > message you're replying to,
> > just the part that's pertinent.
> >
> > Thanks!  You'd save me time and my sanity!
> >
> > Kat  (who's very glad it's Friday)
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2