At least you can't accuse him of marital infidelity and lying about it.
I don't think he's a liar so much as he's too loyal to his friends
and has exercised bad judgement by putting
the wrong people in high government positions and letting do what
they will. I mainly accuse him of bad judgement and being too narrow-
viewed, and too stubborn.
Kat
On 21 Oct 2006, at 10:53, Linda Walker wrote:
no thanks bush is a through and through liar who will do anything to
win. he is our worst president ever and even his own generals are now
defecting from his ignorant policies.
At 08:19 AM 10/20/2006, you wrote:
> this "information" is pure left wing propoganda is
> what is is Linda. YOU DEMOCRATS need to just face the
> fact that you lost the election in 2000 and 2004.
> however look at the bright side it may be that you'll
> win in 2006.
>
> a lie told long enough without being challenged will
> soon become accepted as fact.
>
> --- Linda Walker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > The evidence in Ohio is pretty good. The head of
> > elections promised
> > to win it for Bush and they delivered. That
> > information is pretty
> > widely out. I demanded a hand count of my ballot and
> > refused to use
> > the machine. Humans can make errors also but when
> > the exit polls and
> > the count are way off that is a red flag. And then
> > there was the
> > widespread lack of access to voting in strongly
> > democratic districts
> > where they expected a strong turnout but gave few
> > resources and
> > people had to wait 12 hours to vote. Not too many
> > people can do that.
> >
> > At 02:58 AM 10/20/2006, you wrote:
> > >Do you have definite proof that this was deliberate
> > sabotage and not
> > >machine error? I work with computers and can tell
> > you that computers
> > >are literal machines operating on boolean
> > principles and it's awfully
> > >easy for machines to interpret input wrongly. I
> > used a voting
> > >machine in the last Presidential election and
> > recall that it would
> > >have been all to easy for someone not familiar with
> > computers to make
> > >mistakes.
> > >
> > >I remember I was so angry at the results the day
> > after the 2004
> > >elections that I actually took it out on some poor
> > old soul for
> > >taking the last handicapped parking space at at
> > doctor's office and
> > >swore at him. I'm still angry but am determined
> > that we Dems will
> > >win back the White House in 2008 (I have no hope of
> > any Dems winning
> > >the local races as this area is pretty much
> > Republican and the local
> > >Republican running for Congress would be a newcomer
> > to Congress and
> > >therefore not associated with present scandals or
> > national issues).
> > >
> > >Kat
> > >
> > >
> > >On 20 Oct 2006, at 02:05, Linda Walker wrote:
> > >
> > >Dems could win and the voting machines could switch
> > it to the Reps.
> > >It's happened before and there are now more of
> > these machines in
> > >place than ever.
> > >
> > >At 08:30 PM 10/19/2006, you wrote:
> > > > i did not really post this to start a thread, it
> > is
> > > > okay if it does, i just really wanted you all to
> > read
> > > > it. if the polls are right, the left is going to
> > > > control the congress soon. i just wanted you all
> > to
> > > > recogize what was happening when it happens
> > later on.
> > > >
> > > > --- ken barber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > And oh, btw,
> > > > > > Habeus Corpus is now a thing of the past.
> > We'll
> > > > > all
> > > > > > need to mind our P's and Q's now!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > do you support giving constitutional rights to
> > > > > non-citizen terrorist mike? did you ever even
> > learn
> > > > > the preamble. it starts out "We the people of
> > the
> > > > > UNITED STATES..." Do you think the mastermind
> > of the
> > > > > 9-11 attack deserves to have constitutional
> > rights
> > > > > confered on him?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > habeou corpus is a constitutional right to
> > U.S.
> > > > > Citizens.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > > > protection around
> > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > > >
> > > > > -----------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > To change your mail settings or leave the
> > C-PALSY
> > > > > list, go here:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------
> > > >
> > > > To change your mail settings or leave the
> > C-PALSY list, go here:
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> > >
> > >-----------------------
> > >
> > >To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> > list, go here:
> > >
> >
> >http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> > >
> > >-----------------------
> > >
> > >To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> > list, go here:
> > >
> >
> >http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> > list, go here:
> >
> >
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
