actually those are reasons that they should not have
juristriction, but, article 3 lets congress set the
juristrictions of the federal courts, that was my
question of the improper use of this article and it
was not addressed and left out there, congress may try
this again since that issue was not addressed and
settled.

--- Elizabeth Thiers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  There are several reasons congress and US federal
> courts do not have
> juristiction in this case.  Briefly, two of the
> biggest are that a state has
> the right to define medical best practice
> (intrastate commerce, it's what we
> get our state licensure laws from) and each state
> has the right to define
> the rights between a man and a woman as husband and
> wife.  I find the case
> very disturbing on any count.  Trust me, I would be
> fighting just as hard if
> a husband was trying to keep her alive.  It's there
> choice.
> Bobby, I know what your saying, we probably have
> similar very theoretical,
> unproven theories behind the bulimia issues.  But,
> as is, there are enough
> accusations and theories out there.
>
> Beth T.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Bobby Greer
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 11:41 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Terri Schiavo redux from Inclusion
> Daily Express
>
> Ken, Kat, Beth et al,
>
>     I have mixed emotions about the Schaivo case.
> What I do not understand
> is the US Congress enntering the fray. That will set
> precedence for years to
> come!
>     This is a sad case of both sides of the family
> digging in and competing
> for control. I heard this week before her heart
> attack she was bulimic which
> tellls me alot about her family dynamics.
> I will not go into it since my view is theoretical.
> Let's just say it
> explains to me the guilt feelings of her parents. As
> for drs. disagreeing,
> they do that every day.
>
> Bobby
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ken barber" <[log in to unmask]>
> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c-palsy
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:42 AM
> Subject: Re: Terri Schiavo redux from Inclusion
> Daily Express
>
>
> > well, mag. i agree. but, then the conscince is
> pricked, becouse they
> > are actually doing the killing.
> > they think they are "just letting her die." if
> they starve her. no
> > difference actually.
> >
> > --- Tamar Raine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > Many people do not consider feeding tubes to be
> artificial means. I
> > > have met a few adults with cp who ate that way.
> It's just an
> > > alternate means of feeding. I agree however that
> Terri should die in
> > > peace, but I do not believe she should be
> starved for two weeks to
> > > do it, for heaven's sake, give her an injection.
>  I furthermore
> > > believe that even in marriage, if a spouse is
> suspected of foul play
> > > that the spouse should not have the right to
> terminate their
> > > partner, and this is what I think has happened
> in the Schiavo case.
>



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/