yeah, Edwards is a great example. this had been going on for months and months. the inquirer said the had it for months and did not publish it until he was out of the running. 
who broke the story? ABC? NBC? CBS? CNN? NO NO NO AND NO. THE NEW YORK TIMES? THE WASHINGTON POST? CHICAGO TIMES? LA TIMES? ATLASNTA URINAL AND CONSTIPATION? WELL NO!! 
right next to the lady who had a 300 ponnd baby fathered by an alien from mars in the national inquirer was where it was.

now the NY times ran an article about McCain on a rumor and an enuendo. well i can see where you might think they are impartial, but it just don't quite wash with little ole me. 

thank you for giving me a prime example.  


--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Kathy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Kathy <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 7:18 PM
> I think he's saying the press is too liberal to really
> dig up dirt 
> against Obama.  I beg to differ.  If The Enquirer had been
> able to dig 
> up dirt against him they would have.  Just look at John
> Edwards.
> 


      

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy