C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathleen Salkin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cerebral Palsy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 May 2006 06:56:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Ken, I am sorry to hear of the hearing's results.  I know these are  
bureaucrats and not law courts but I think you can say the same of  
SSDB adjudications.  If you keep appealing to the end of the process,  
I'm sure you will win in the end - hang in there, mate.

Kat

On 3 May 2006, at 19:24, ken barber wrote:

   The hearing decision was just a rehash of what had
been done and affirming> the first opinion. Nothing
was said of all the doctors opinions we gave them. It
was like nothing new was added at the hearing. I
really do not know> why it took 75 days for this. She
apparently did not look at anything new.
   She could have typed this the next day.

    basically i can't get a real hearing because i have
cp and they can't concive that i could be injured
further. i think most of you understand this.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2