C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
Date:
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:56:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Yes, but if the tax credit is still available next year, you'll be able to claim it then.

Singles with no children don't at all.  Which OK with me but I do wish the Administration would quit touting it as being for everyone.

Kat

-------Original Message-------
From: Trisha Cummings <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 07/24/03 09:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: History redux; was RE: Quiz About 9/11

>
> Hi Kat,

   Not all single parents get the $400. Child must be born between now and
1985. So people with kids 16 and up - don't get the break. I fail to
understand the logic. If you claim a child - you should get the benefit. So both
mine are 1986 vintage - so no cookies. Side note altho I had Alex last
year from April on - I was not allowed to claim her on my taxes even tho I do
100% of her support - non blood relations must live with you for a year
before you can cliam them. This doesn't seem fair either. The state of
Virginia gave me sole custody, surely a legal document should show just cause for
being able to claim her.  Nothing about system seems fair or logical.

                                             Trisha

> I'm not getting any of that $400, remember?  It's an earned income
> credit for children, not singletons without children.
>
> Let me make it clear that I don't begrudge the parents that $400; God
> knows they need it.  It's just that the $3 less in taxes per paycheck
> isn't much to put back into the economy and I'd far rather that were put
> into social welfare and environmental programs.
>
> Kat
>
> Cleveland, Kyle E. wrote:
> > Well, Kat, the "official" line on the avg. $400 per family
check/cheque was
> > that we (the average American compulsive over-spender) would toss that
check
> > back into the economic river as fast as we could get it out of our
mailboxes
> > and into the bank.  That was supposed to "kick-start" the economy and
put
> > Mr. Bush into a favorable light as the president who gave back some of
the
> > tax dollars we all complain about having to pay.  Isn't that a pretty
fair
> > assessment of the administration's logic?  Trouble is, I don't know of
a
> > soul who thought this was a good idea.  I know no one who thought the
check
> > they're supposed to get this summer (Btw, haven't got mine yet. Have
you?)
> > was worth the kick in the knees it gave to an already unsteady
economic
> > recovery.  Now, the recovery has stopped and we're back to deficit
spending
> > again (to be fair, though, our economic slowdown started before the
> > election--it just didn't become apparent until GWB was already in
office).
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2