And to question it.  The problem is, Christians have been questioning the
role of vengence and violence in the Christian religion since Christs death
so, we could both pull bible verses till our eyes turned blue <grin>.
That's why we have so many Christian sects arguing over who has the truth.  

But still why always pull out the extreme compared to the everyday.  Why is
it reason vs. vengence?  Police work vs. torture?  And again I'm more
fearful of what is happening vs. what might happen.  The point is relative
risk tells me I'm much more apt to die in a car wreck or from a bee sting or
from an asthma attack, than I am from a terrorist attack.  Give me the
rights are folks have died for over the years.  I would rather live with
liberty and risk any day. 

Beth t. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ken barber [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 11:09 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: another black eye for the administration...
> 
> he himself said he came to fulfill it, not to desrtoy it. and 
> said not one jot nor title woild pass away.
> both the old and new are valid if you look at the principles 
> they are based on. nothing really contradicts, it all meshes 
> together once you get to studying it all. i can not even tell 
> you how many times i have read it in its entireity in the 51 
> years i have been studying it. if i survive until next summer 
> it will be 52 years. time really flys, now i am rabling like 
> the old man i am.  
> 
> however, no, that was not what i was thinking of. i was 
> thinking of a section in proverbs. i'll have to look the 
> actual verse up and give it to you. however my wife is asleep 
> in there where my Bible is so it will have to wait for the 
> time being. 
 
> > Beth t. 
>

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy