I read that she had to wear the sweater on the sales floor until they
switched over to the winter uniform which has sleeves.  But when she
objected, they moved her to the stock room.

Which version is correct???  I'm sure by the time we get the news
across the pond it's been diluted.

Kat

On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Michael H. Collis<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Deri, I was under the impression that the woman was not embarassed about the  prosthetic,  A & F was trying to hids the prosthetic because of the "look" policy.
>
>
> ---- Original message ----
>>Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:38:05 +0100
>>From: Deri James <[log in to unmask]>
>>Subject: Re: Woman with disability wins suit against Abercrombie and Fitch
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>On Thursday 13 August 2009 19:32:35 Kendall D. Corbett wrote:
>>> But in tortured logic, says discrimination was not a result of her
>>> disability.
>>>
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/8200140.stm
>>
>>Hi Kendall,
>>
>>Yes, she lost the disability case. Looks to me the court got it about right.
>>She refused to follow their stupid "dress code" claiming she had to wear a
>>cardigan because she was embarrassed to show her prosthetic. However, I note
>>she's quite happy to "reveal all" to the press!!
>>
>>Cheers
>>
>>Deri
>>
>>-----------------------
>>
>>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>>
>>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy