I did not get the latest spam, so I think your theory may be correct.

Linda
---- Original Message ----
From: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask],
Subject: Re: Fwd: Treatment of CEREBRAL PALSY
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 21:54:57 +0100

>On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 2:49 pm, Salkin Kathleen wrote:
>> Can't the network admin at St. Johns do something about this, Deri?
>>  I guess it'd be a choice between keeping our archives private and
>> making them publicly accessible. <sigh>  I guess we'd need to put
>> up with this sort of four-letter word excretement in return for
>> public access.
>>
>> Kat
>
>Kary, the network admin, can  do nothing. Making the archives private
>would make no difference, since any person can join (and then "reap"
>the archives - or more likely send the ListServ command which returns
>the membership list (minus those set to "conceal")). So for that to
>work you would have to restrict membership - not something I'd be
>happy with.
>
>I'd be interested to know how many people got this latest spam (Apr
>04) from monsieur Jost. I wrote to him a few weeks ago asking him to
>remove all addresses he'd harvested from C-Palsy, and although I did
>not receive a reply, I also haven't received any more spam. I know
>Kathy Jo is on more than 1 list that he nicked addresses from, so
>theoretically he could have complied with my wishes but some
>individuals would still be receiving due to their presence on other
>lists.. The other, an more likely, answer is that he's just taken me
>off the list!!!
>
>Cheers
>
>Deri
>