i think 100 was a fluke. if we want to set it up some, set it back down
after the discussion quites down.

-----Original Message-----
From: greer.bobby [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 9:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Message volume


Carla,

        300 seems a bit high to me. We have people complaining about volume
now. However, I will go along with what the people of the list want as well
as
the feasibility of such a high number from a systems viewpoint (Ken, Kyle,
Deri, help me out here).

Bobby

Carla MacInnis wrote:

> Looks like treatment alternatives and aging is a hot topic. Set the limit
to
> 300 :)
>
> "Bobby G. Greer" wrote:
>
> > For the first time since I have been one of the list managers, we
recived
> > notice last night that we had exceeded our alloted100 messages in one
day.
> >
> > Deri,
> >
> >     I set it to 150. do we need to reset it back to 100 at some point?
> >
> > Bobby