although i do think no tax at all is better. 

why should distributing wealth be one of the purposes
of taxes? 
i agree that it is, but why should it be? 

--- Deri James <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Sunday 25 March 2007 04:13, ken barber wrote:
> > did you study the plan?
> >
> 
> Of course!! Can't think of an "unfairer" way of
> distributing wealth (which is 
> one of the purposes of taxation).
> 
> Did you read the interview with Edward Wolff at 
>
<http://multinationalmonitor.org/mm2003/03may/may03interviewswolff.html>?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Deri
> 
> -----------------------
> 
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> 
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love 
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy