C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathleen Salkin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cerebral Palsy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:06:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
Don't you think those decreasing numbers could be explained by the  
influx of new residents?

Kat


On 7 Sep 2006, at 19:03, Kendall David Corbett wrote:

Interesting charts on Utah demographic shifts from 1989 to 2004.

http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site297/2005/0726/20050726_1
01404_DTTTRB24A10.PDF



Kendall

An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's redundant!)

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all
progress depends on the unreasonable man.

-George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathleen Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:01 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [C-PALSY] Polygamy Story a rant

You know ... this is all very interesting to me because whilst I'm
quite liberal and believe that anyone has got the freedom to worship
as they please, I also believe that  you must heed the dictum that no
harm should befall others.  But as an American, I also advidly
believe in the Bill of Rights which guarantee the freedom of religion
to all Americans, and I also believe in the separation between church
and state.

So where do we draw the line?  Polygamy by consenting adults
theoretically should be OK (that is, if you go by the Bill of Rights)
and the government shouldn't have the right to interfere.  On the
other hand, the ethical scientific side of me cringes because of the
higher possibility of genetic abnormalties and the higher risk of
miscarriages, not to mention that if you try to limit the
participation to a small group of people, practically speaking, you
would run out of age-eligible wives fairly quickly - and thus that's
probably the main reason so much polygamous activity is underaged.
If you do the maths, this is obvious.

In any case, our society does not support such a structure which is
good - but this does make for interesting discussions such as the one
I had with David last night on this subject!

Kat


On 7 Sep 2006, at 16:46, Kendall David Corbett wrote:

Mike,

<cut for brevity, to spare other's inboxes! ;) )

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2