so are you okay with a man humping a campaign worker while his wife is fighting for her life against cancer? and i'd like a little bit of a clear explaination of just whose money he was using to pay her 3000 dollars a month to have her quiet. i'd certainly think that campaign
contributors just might be equally as curious.
by the way you ever hear of a man named Revsco? i hope i spelled it correctly.
--- On Sat, 9/6/08, Tamar Raine
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Tamar Raine <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 11:51 PM
> i don't think an affair breaks my belief in a
public
> offical. For instance, if Clinton had just said,
Yes, I
> had an affair with Lewinsky, that would not have
broken my
> trust in him. Big deal, whoopie do. but the fact
that he
> lied about it was stupid. I was much more concerned
about
> Bosnia, about NAFTA, and why was he going so far to
the
> right........
>
> what would do it for me would be if they were abusing
> power, if they were unethical, if there were secret
> dealings. For instance if Obama was part of the
chicago
> political machine, I am sure I could dig up the dirt
on the
> web.
> >
> > Mag
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > http://www.zazzle.com/TamarMag*
> > Tamar Mag Raine
> > [log in to unmask]
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2008 6:11:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> >
> > yeah, Edwards is a great example. this had been going
> on
> > for months and months. the inquirer said the had it
> for
> > months and did not publish it until he was out of the
> > running.
> > who broke the story? ABC? NBC? CBS? CNN? NO NO NO AND
> NO.
> > THE NEW YORK TIMES? THE WASHINGTON POST? CHICAGO
> TIMES? LA
> > TIMES? ATLASNTA URINAL AND CONSTIPATION? WELL NO!!
> > right next to the lady who had a 300 ponnd baby
> fathered by
> > an alien from mars in the national inquirer was where
> it
> > was.
> >
> > now the NY times ran an article about McCain on a
> rumor and
> > an enuendo. well i can see where you might think they
> are
> > impartial, but it just don't quite wash with
> little ole
> > me.
> >
> > thank you for giving me a prime example.
> >
> >
> > --- On Sat, 9/6/08, Kathy <[log in to unmask]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Kathy <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 7:18 PM
> > > I think he's saying the press is too liberal
> to
> > really
> > > dig up dirt
> > > against Obama. I beg to differ. If The
> Enquirer
> > had been
> > > able to dig
> > > up dirt against him they would have. Just look
> at
> > John
> > > Edwards.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go
> > here:
> >
> >
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
