there have been probably more skirt chasers than we'll ever know. if i could tell you about some of the models for Miss Liberty on our coins.... i am not worried about skirtchasers. kat brought up edwards(and yes he's a cad.), but i am worried about someone who associstes themeselves with anti american groups (ie liberation theology Trinity United which as a christian i find to be a repugnant corruption of the gospel), with unrepentant terrorist (bill ayers, who said in the new york times out the day the towers fell."i don't regreat setting bombs, i do not think we did enough." is one of obama's first key political associates) and corruption like rezco.
maybe all of this is okay with you but i raise an eyebrow and ask where is the media.
of course i do not HATE the present president enough to BLIND me to the future like so many. yes, i said "HATE." hate does blind and it is not good to vote based on Hate but there will be a lot of hate voting in november.
--- On Sun, 9/7/08, Michael H. Collis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Michael H. Collis <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Sunday, September 7, 2008, 5:32 PM
> Ken, how many presidents were supposedly
> "skirtchasers" in office? there were apparently
> quite a few. the most notorious being Clinton, Kennedy,
> Jefferson, and Grover Cleveland. Kyle, you two aren't
> related, are you?
>
> ---- Original message ----
> >Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:00:53 -0700
> >From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
> >Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> > so are you okay with a man humping a campaign worker
> while his wife is fighting for her life against cancer? and
> i'd like a little bit of a clear explaination of just
> whose money he was using to pay her 3000 dollars a month to
> have her quiet. i'd certainly think that campaign
> > contributors just might be equally as curious.
> >
> >by the way you ever hear of a man named Revsco? i hope
> i spelled it correctly.
> >
> > --- On Sat, 9/6/08, Tamar Raine
> > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Tamar Raine <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 11:51 PM
> > > i don't think an affair breaks my belief in a
> > public
> > > offical. For instance, if Clinton had just
> said,
> > Yes, I
> > > had an affair with Lewinsky, that would not have
> > broken my
> > > trust in him. Big deal, whoopie do. but the
> fact
> > that he
> > > lied about it was stupid. I was much more
> concerned
> > about
> > > Bosnia, about NAFTA, and why was he going so far
> to
> > the
> > > right........
> > >
> > > what would do it for me would be if they were
> abusing
> > > power, if they were unethical, if there were
> secret
> > > dealings. For instance if Obama was part of the
> > chicago
> > > political machine, I am sure I could dig up the
> dirt
> > on the
> > > web.
> >> >
> >> > Mag
> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> > http://www.zazzle.com/TamarMag*
> >> > Tamar Mag Raine
> >> >
> [log in to unmask]
> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> > From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
> >> > To: [log in to unmask]
> >> > Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2008 6:11:20 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> >> >
> >> > yeah, Edwards is a great example. this had
> been going
> >> on
> >> > for months and months. the inquirer said the
> had it
> >> for
> >> > months and did not publish it until he was
> out of the
> >> > running.
> >> > who broke the story? ABC? NBC? CBS? CNN? NO
> NO NO AND
> >> NO.
> >> > THE NEW YORK TIMES? THE WASHINGTON POST?
> CHICAGO
> >> TIMES? LA
> >> > TIMES? ATLASNTA URINAL AND CONSTIPATION? WELL
> NO!!
> >> > right next to the lady who had a 300 ponnd
> baby
> >> fathered by
> >> > an alien from mars in the national inquirer
> was where
> >> it
> >> > was.
> >> >
> >> > now the NY times ran an article about McCain
> on a
> >> rumor and
> >> > an enuendo. well i can see where you might
> think they
> >> are
> >> > impartial, but it just don't quite wash
> with
> >> little ole
> >> > me.
> >> >
> >> > thank you for giving me a prime example.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- On Sat, 9/6/08, Kathy
> <[log in to unmask]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > From: Kathy <[log in to unmask]>
> >> > > Subject: Re: Palin's little lies
> >> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> >> > > Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 7:18
> PM
> >> > > I think he's saying the press is too
> liberal
> >> to
> >> > really
> >> > > dig up dirt
> >> > > against Obama. I beg to differ. If
> The
> >> Enquirer
> >> > had been
> >> > > able to dig
> >> > > up dirt against him they would have.
> Just look
> >> at
> >> > John
> >> > > Edwards.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----------------------
> >> >
> >> > To change your mail settings or leave the
> C-PALSY
> >> list, go
> >> > here:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----------------------
> >
> >To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list,
> go here:
> >
> >http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go
> here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
