BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Becker, Dan" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Listserv that makes holes in Manhattan schist for free! <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 May 2007 12:20:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edison Coatings
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:16 PM
> 
> 
> The use of portland cement repointing/rebuilding mortar on 
> masonry construction originally built with lime or natural 
> cement is problematic because:

> 4. If portland mortars require repointing more frequently 
> than natural cement mortars, then portland represents a less 
> sustainable approach, as every round of repointing induces 
> damage and loss of fabric to the original structure. 

You might want to comment on why portland requires repointing more
frequently....

Dan


“E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina  Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized City or Law Enforcement official.”

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2