BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Judith E. Selwyn" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Louis Sullivan Smiley-Face Listserv! <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:01:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
My experince in fugal New England is that only the last (outer) 
pointing mortar got the pigment.




On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Gabriel Orgrease wrote:

>>     (ruling out historically tinted mortars)
>>
>> When 19th century builders colored the mortar to bring out colors in 
>> the surrounding masonry, did they color the entire batch?     Or is 
>> it only the first inch or two?
>>
> c,
>
> It takes extra work to repoint the outer portion of brickwork on a 
> large building, say the B & N bldg. at Union Square w/ the steam 
> pressed brick and very thin "Coney Island" butter joints. The mortar 
> there, in different colors for different portions of the architecture 
> and for different materials of the facade, was tinted through and 
> through. My feeling is that this was the prevalent trade practice. But 
> I have also seen evidence of walls built with an untinted mortar then 
> followed up with a tinted top pointing. It would likely be work where 
> more expense and care was intended and les focused on optimal 
> production in the building process. So there is no exact yes-no answer 
> to your question. As our esteemed Mr. Edision has pointed out one 
> needs to look at the forensic evidence of the structure. Problem is 
> getting to see into the wall, which is where probes come in handy.
>
> FYI there is a point where the percentage of tint to mortar begins to 
> have what is considered an adverse effect on the strength of the 
> mortar. I do not remember where that point is at... seem to remember 
> people arguing over if it as 10% or 15%. For the most part I don't 
> need to worry about it. As to mortar analysis I suspect that it is 
> nearly impossible, certainly impractical, to determine what the 
> proportion of tint is within an existing mortar. When one wants to 
> match to an existing color of tinted mortar it is partly through trial 
> and error, science and art. Note that I did not include bull crap in 
> that recipe.
>
> ][<
>
> --
> To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
> uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
> <http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
>

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2