LISTSERV - BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Coating analysis interpretation
From:	"Becker, Dan" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	maybe this could fall apart after the checks clear <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:36:21 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (32 lines)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: M. P. Edison
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Coating analysis interpretation
> 
> 
> If the coating is really very hard, then the 150% elongation 
> reported could be suspect. I don't recall seeing any hardness 
> data, however.

This from their web site list...I never thought of "Tensile Strength" as
a measurement of hardness.

Property        Test Method             Test Results    Benefit
Evaluated
 
Tensile         ASTM D 2370             451 PSI         Hardness or 
Strength
Toughness

__________________________________________________
Dan Becker,  Exec. Dir.    "Oh joy!  Rapture!  Now
Raleigh Historic            I have a brain!"
Districts Commission                   - Scarecrow
[log in to unmask]  
919/890-3678 

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG