Ralph,

Onto something or not I like the old houses and my concern is that folks 
would find themselves at the wrong end of losing what they value most 
when they assume to give it over to the care of a system that does not 
tend to reinforce similar values. If it is not good then at least I 
would like as best as possible to see it for what it is and we then try 
to learn how to deal with it from there.

][<en

[log in to unmask] wrote:

>
> *I'm very much afraid you may be onto someting very valid here, and I 
> don't think it's a good thing.  What's the real difference between old 
> houses and old National Geographics, except that NG's take up less room?
>
>
> And I speak as one with a basement, and house, full of junk (but not 
> National Geographics).
>
> Ralph*
>  [I see it as a similar to those folks who believe their old National 
> Geographics must be worth money. Just because you have held onto them 
> for ages does not mean anyone else wants them.]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free 
> from AOL at *AOL.com* <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437>.
> -- To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the 
> uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to: 
> http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html 

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>