BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leland Torrence <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 13 Jan 1998 14:31:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Mary,
I have only recently had an ear to the pinheads.  Can you give me a brief
synopsis of what the discussion is on the Standards. I am currently working
on a project for the modification of the Standards for "affordable
neighborhoods".
Curious,
Leland

----------
> From: MDK10 <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Buildings
> Date: Friday, January 09, 1998 4:33 PM
>
> In a message dated 1/9/98 3:42:24 PM EST, [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > The whole process is set up to
> >  worry the hell out of them until they give you a crumb with which to
sop up
> >  what's left in the bottom of the bowl in order that they may maintain
some
> >  semblance of their project schedule.
>
> Not only do you get a crumb at the end, but you have to fight like crazy
to
> even get a place at the table, in spite of all the reverent talk of
> "consultation."  And once they have SAID they will give you a crumb,
> sometimes, when all is said and done, the crumb has been forgotten, all
is
> lost, and there is little remedy.
>
> MKrugman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2