BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ruth Barton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
If someone gets rich, I do not cheer for them - I weep for myself. (NYC cabdriver)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:08:34 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
 Only if you put it in your rum and Coke.  Ruth




At 10:10 AM -0500 2/26/02, Ken Follett wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/2002 12:15:06 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

Lime-- it's not just for masons anymore.



Early in my career I asked the stonemason I was mentored by why he thought
masons tended to be drunks... at least all the masons we knew were drunks,
and he said it had to be the lime. (A socio-physiological impetus to use
Portland mortars?) I asked him if that was the case then how come all the
painters we knew were also drunks? He did not have an answer. It might have
been because we were drunks and everyone we knew were drunks which may have
had to do with that when we were not working we were socializing, sort of,
in back country taverns, or sleeping it off. Is there a connection between
lime and alcoholism?

][<en

--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Westminster, VT

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2