BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mike Duke, K5XU" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mike Duke, K5XU
Date:
Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:17:45 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (120 lines)
The Chinese are trying very hard to catch up with Kenwood in the 
accessibility department.

Elecraft has accessibility for those of us who know CW.

The others, all of them, wouldn't know the meaning of accessibility if 
it slapped them in the face.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kelvin Marsh" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: accessiblity of two yaesu radios


Hi,

I've recently had an FT-450 on the bench here, to write an 
accessibility
review for Active Elements.  One of the big charities in the UK has 
bought
FT-450s for their blind members, and I was keen to take a look.

In my opinion, the fact it has a voice readout fitted as standard is 
fairly
misleading.  The uninitiated will believe it is accessible.

I found the frequency readout did not read to the hundreds of 
kilohertz.  It
would read 7.100.0.  It was missing the last digit you need for 
standard
accuracy.  OK, you could net with a station by ear, but you could 
never get
to 7.100.00 to run an exact rounded  frequency yourself.  There was no
keypad, compounding the problem.

The second niggle was that pressing the readout key, caused the RX to 
be
silent.  The voice was so slow, it took 13 seconds to read.

I only evaluated the FT-450, not the FT-450D.  Perhaps it has 
improved...
In contrast, I've also just had a few days with a FT-2000.  OK, there 
is no
voice chip, but I could use this fairly happily through the CAT, 
including
using split and the second RX.

Best wishes, Kelvin Marsh - M0AID

Working to improve accessibility for radio amateurs with disabilities

www.active-elements.org

For accessibility evaluations of amateur equipment and MP3 manuals


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators 
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Miller
Sent: 31 December 2012 18:08
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: accessiblity of two yaesu radios

Yaesu never did care about accessibility, the 847 was a 1 off try at 
it and
had a lot of problems, and now they have the ft-450 which took one of 
my
sighted friends, with the manual almost 3 hours to figure out how to 
turn
the voice read out on at a special event so I could use the radio and 
I
still did not like the radio at all. The RIT/XIT knob on my ts-2000 is 
about

the size of the tuning dial on the FT-450, even the IC-706 has a 
bigger dial

than that. I was far from impressed. Sadly that's what a lot of the 
hospital

EOC's have in this area of the state, I suppose if you're not tuning 
around
it's OK, but I'd hate to have to sit there tuning around with it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Thurman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: accessiblity of two yaesu radios


> yaesu walked away from accessible radios when they dropped the ft 
> 847 =
> which is why I will not own another yaesu rig. also icon and ken 
> wood =
> rigs seem to be more reliable in my opinion
> On Dec 30, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Bob Ray <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,  I already know about the wonders of the kenwood 
>> products =
> like
>> the TMV-71A but I have been asked if a person can use either the =
> FT-8900R or
>> VR-7R(b)?  Any thoughts on these two radios would be appreciated.
>>=20
>> 73,
>>=20
>> Bob KD0BR



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2637/5981 - Release Date: 
12/23/12
Internal Virus Database is out of date. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2