In my email, I was referring to the usability of braille. I understand the
cost is often prohibitive, and that's regrettable. It really is the way to
go for access to your radio.
--
Jim, KE5AL
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Behler
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 1:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Ten Tec radios
Jim:
I hear you. ... Braille access to ham rigs is great, and I truly applaud
you for all your efforts with the J J software, which is on my list of
things to try just as soon as possible.
But what about those who don't have access to, or cannot afford a Braille
display?
Perhaps I'm missing your point, so please feel free to correct any errors in
my thinking here.
Just trying to have an open discussion.
Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jim Shaffer
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 1:55 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Ten Tec radios
Ron, good point.
However, I consider audio access to a radio as minimal accessibility.
Imagine a car where, in order to drive it, you had to take your eyes off the
road. I've become convinced that braille provides the only true access to
ham rigs.
--
Jim, KE5AL
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Ronald E. Milliman
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 11:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Ten Tec radios
Jim and others here on the list, please accept my comments in the positive
manner in which they are intended. First, I certainly applaud the actions
Mike and Jim have taken. Too many times we only complain but do little to
solve our own problems.
However, we need to communicate to Mike Dishop and John, the Ten Tec
developer, that Jim's software approach is only one solution and in the
longer run, we need a solution built into the Ten Tec line of transceivers
that is completely independent of Jim's software. We need to be able to
purchase Ten Tec rigs that are accessible right out of the box just like
they are for sighted hams, much like the Kenwood line of transceivers.
Ron, K8HSY
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jim Shaffer
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 10:08 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Ten Tec radios
Here's a note I sent to the Ten Tec developer in response to his query...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Shaffer
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Ten Tec radios
John, in addition to VFO, Frequency and mode, blind hams need readings such
as s-meter, SWR, AGC on/off and level, noise blanker on/off and level, noise
reduction on/off and level, VOX/breakin settings, mic and speech processor
settings, ALC, and anything that might effect operations. For example, the
TS-590 has a feature to drive an amp with minimal power from the radio. If
accidentally set, the rig basically doesn't transmit. It is nice to know
the receive filter settings, but these are generally set by ear anyway. I
would say that the ability to control the AF and RF gain is of minimal
importance, at least where accessibility is concerned.
Also, for many radios, access to the memories and menus is often difficult,
if possible at all. My software reports and sets memory values as well as
providing text for the menu settings.
Also, I need to be able to provide support for reasonably priced rigs.
Unfortunately, many blind folks are on limited budgets.
hth, and thanks again.
--
Jim Shaffer, KE5AL
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
|
