Edward:

Thanks for reminding me of a very important detail that I had forgotten in 
my previous posts.

I am a qrz.com member, and use my member log-in whenever looking up a call.

Again, sorry about the ommission.

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Edward alonzo (KE5KRI)" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: QRZ.com


> Hello Tom:
> i also had trouble with qrz. it seems that you have to have an account =
> to access any callsign data now.
> If, however you use an iPhone there is a very good app called callsign =
> that you can use to look up call signs.
>
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 1:19 PM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I still use qrz and don't find it as bad as everyone else does for 
> some=20=
>
> reason.
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 1:57 PM
> Subject: QRZ.com
>
>
>> Hi, everyone.
>>=20
>> I was just looking up a call on qrz.com, and was dismayed to find the=20=
>
>> search
>> function and resultant information for a given call is less 
>> accessible=20=
>
>> than
>> it has ever been.
>>=20
>> It does not seem as easy to get to the QRZ look-up as it once was, 
>> and=20=
>
>> even
>> when there, it is more difficult to access different pieces of =
> information
>> for a given call sign.
>>=20
>> I know that wm7d has been suggested as another alternative, and may =
> now
>> start using that web site exclusively for call sign lookups.
>>=20
>> Has anyone had similar recent experience with qrz.com??
>>=20
>> I am using Jaws 13 and Windows XP on this particular computer.
>>=20
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>=20
>