BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:25:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (91 lines)
I would opt for something that doesn't make noise into analogue.  Can you
imagine if we did away with analogue all at once?  I wouldn't want to go
there.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brent Harding" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: IBOC AM question


> I've heard that like many other standards, we're one of the few countries
> using, or still playing with it. I think IBOC's been a debate around radio
> awhile now. I think I've heard of stories where stations have tried it and
> decided to turn it off because it needs so much spectrum to run. I think
> the
> only way we could really go digital with radio with current technology is
> to
> eliminate analog at once, or develope something that doesn't make noise
> noticable in to the analog audio.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 5:00 PM
> Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
>
>
>> I don't know, and that is what I am wondering if this is maybe something
>> that isn't in the testing phase for right now.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Brent Harding" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:18 PM
>> Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
>>
>>
>> > Yeah, in dad's truck it works fine, but I heard IBOC makes the deal
> worse,
>> > and well, if there's no receivers for it out, who's listening to the
>> > digital
>> > signal?
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:02 PM
>> > Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
>> >
>> >
>> >> I've gotten WTMJ from here in Michigan, but that could cause a problem
> if
>> >> you are in an apartment building with a lot of computers and RF.
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Brent Harding" <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:57 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: IBOC AM question
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >I heard WTMJ in Milwaukee started using it too, that's one station
>> >> >you
>> > just
>> >> > don't get in Green Bay, not in an apartment anyways, takes being in
>> >> > a
>> > car
>> >> > for some of those distant ones, heard IBOC makes the problem worse.
>> >> >
>> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:31 PM
>> >> > Subject: IBOC AM question
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi everyone, I have been hearing a few things here and there about
>> >> >> IBOC
>> >> >> digital on AM and some short-wave stuff, and I have a few stations
>> > around
>> >> >> the Detroit area that I think are using the IBOC.  This includes
>> >> >> WWJ
>> > and
>> >> >> WCHB 1200 and our family life station WUFL, 1030.  Has anyone used
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> receiver that will work with IBOC and what have your opinions been
> and
>> > do
>> >> >> you all have any suggestions as to what to invest in?
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2