BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Curtis Delzer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:25:31 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I am interested, will check Amazon, or call you to hear it maybe?


At 12:14 PM 02/08/13, you wrote:
>We just got a honeywell wireless doorbell a year or so ago.  It is
>electronic and has several options for chimes but some of them sound
>excellent -- not fake at all.  I use the westminster chime selection which
>is nice because it lasts for a few seconds so you're not in a remote part of
>the house wondering if you just heard the doorbell.  Also, since it's
>wireless, I can pick it up and take it down to the shack if we're expecting
>a delivery or something and I need to be sure to hear it.  It cost around 50
>bucks.  I don't have the model number off hand but I can get it if you're
>interested.  73,  lou
>Lou Kolb
>Voice-over Artist:
>Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
>Messages On-hold:
>www.loukolb.com
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Curtis Delzer" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 3:01 PM
>Subject: door chimes? doorbell?
>
>
> > I've come across a fundamental problem here in this new home of ours,
> > which is a mobile, and that is the crummy doorbell it has, which a
> > lot of people don't pay much attention too, but we must have. We
> > don't like the typical sounding "ding dong" type, so please could you
> > guys suggest which you may have that you like, etc.  My friend,
> > Larry, has one, for example which chimes like the sound for an early
> > old radio network intro, and we truly like the natural chimes much
> > better than those pseudo electronic type, though we'll get those if
> > we must, so anyone, suggest?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2