Yes, that's the one. Thanks, Steve.
---Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Steve Forst
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 4:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Any Success using JT65-HF?
Doug,
No experience withJT65, but for PSK the Digipan software allows you to use
the left and right arrow keys to jump between signals. Maybe this is the
one you were thinking of.
73, Steve KW3A
On 7/3/2012 11:43 PM, Doug Payne wrote:
> NO, I have RP; I can no longer see well enough to red a waterfall display.
>
> I heard of one digital mode package (I can't remember which one),
> which had a waterfall display, but you could move from signal to
> signal by pressing a hotkey. I thought I might get lucky with this
> package. Probably not, but you never know until you try.
>
> --Doug AC7T
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Michael Thurman
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 7:59 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Any Success using JT65-HF?
>
> wow I would not have even looked at that program since the other jt =
> stuff I tried was completely inaccessible... or are you one of the
> lucky = ones whoare partial and can see enough with magnificaiton and a
huge = screen?
>
> On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:55 PM, Doug Payne wrote:
>
>> Lou is correct.I didn't know it was used on HF either, until I read
>> =
> the
>> article in May QST. It certainly seems promising. It makes me wonder
>> =
> about
>> the differences between JT65 and JT65-HF. The software author says it
>> =
> is
>> JT65 tweaked for use on HF, but doesn't go into details.
>> =20
>> I'll play around with this sometime this week and let you all know =
> what I
>> discover.
>> --Doug, AC7T
>> =20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators =
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Lou Kolb
>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 11:37 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Any Success using JT65-HF?
>> =20
>> Jt65 is like psk31 in that it's another digital mode. I've never had
>> =
> any
>> experience with it but the word is it can detect signals inaudible to
>> =
> the
>> human ear. Signals that are well below the noise level. I hadn't =
> known
>> that there was an HF version of it. Usually, it's used on VHF for =
> moon
>> bounce work.
>> Lou Kolb
>> Voice-over Artist:
>> Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
>> Messages On-hold:
>> www.loukolb.com
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 2:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: Any Success using JT65-HF?
>> =20
>> =20
>>> Hi Doug,
>>> What is Jt-65?
>>> Is that like psk31?
>>> They say with psk31, even the weakest stations are heard!
>>> Trippy, ac8s
>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>> From: Doug Payne=3D20
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 10:49 PM
>>> Subject: Any Success using JT65-HF?
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> Hi Fellow-Listers,
>>> =20
>>> =3D20
>>> =20
>>> Have any of you had success using the JT65-HF software? I just read
>>> a=20=
>
>>> =3D short article about this mode in May 2012 QST, and it sounds =
> like I=20
>>> may be =3D able to use this mode effectively, even with my modest
>>> HF=20=
>
>>> setup. Of course, =3D that depends on the accessibilty of the =
> software,=20
>>> among other things. I am interested in hearing your experiences.=20
>>> Thanks.
>>> =20
>>> =3D20
>>> =20
>>> --Doug, AC7T
>
>
>
|
