Russ,
How do you use that connector? I'm guessing that you'd have to inject a
signal to supply the carrier, or possibly something more complicated. Does
that mean that Ccrane has an accessory for SSB reception?
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 09:07
Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
> From what I understand, the latest cc radio isn't any better than the
> earlier version. I was also told there is a connection on the back of the
> cc radio sw for an option to receive ssb.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Gormley" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>
>
>> the ccradio sw can't receive sideband and I wouldn't recommend it as a
>> shortwave receiver for that reason. The later model which has the
>> 2-meter
>> band replacing the channels 2-13 is a better choice.
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 9:57 AM
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>
>>> Has anyone looked at the CCradio sw? It seems to have very good specs
>>> on
>>> am.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Kris Hickerson" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 8:54 AM
>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>
>>>
>>>>I agree, Tom. I have both the two and the three, also. I like them
>>>> both,but the two is far superior to the three in my opinion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have seen a couple of the C Crane radios and I'm not that impressed.
>>>> I'll
>>>> take the super radios over them any day. I think the C Crane are way
>>>> over
>>>> priced. When you see what GE was able to do with the two and three for
>>>> a
>>>> really reasonable price and, you compare them to the C Crane radios at
>>>> much
>>>> higher prices, for me it is not worth it.
>>>>
>>>> Kris
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:23 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Well, I have a 3 and a 2 here, and will use that 2 until it doesn't
>>>>> play
>>>>> any more! (grin)
>>>>>
>>>>> And, I do think the sound of the 2 is far better than the 3.
>>>>>
>>>>> The base and trebble controls really make a difference on the 2, while
>>>>> on
>>>>> the 3, they are marginal.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 2:11 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a 3 here. It's ok but from what I understand, the 2 was the
>>>>> one
>>>>> to
>>>>> have. The Secrane radios seem to perform well but I doubt they sound
>>>>> as
>>>>> good as the super radios since they don't have that big case and
>>>>> speaker.
>>>>> Lou
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:57 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wow, that is really troubling!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 8:29 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks the same, but far worse than the GE 3.
>>>
>
|
