hmm maybe i shall contact them and give them a piece of my mind now too
besides the radio side of it, who would pay $32 for a stupid chat room
On
Tue, 31 Oct 2006, John Miller wrote:
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:02:17 -0500
> From: John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>
> that's exactly what it is. I asked the person, Douglas I think his name is,
> if that's what it was and he said flat out that's all it is.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt VanDeWalle" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 12:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>
>
>> eah i saw that but who would pay $33 for what is turning out to look like
>> just another chatroom claiming to be for hams
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Russ Kiehne wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:27:10 -0800
>>> From: Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>>>
>>>> From what I understand, you have to pay for the service!
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Matt VanDeWalle" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 6:57 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>>>
>>>
>>>> hmm, good for people that don't have an hf rig and want to use hf i
>>>> guess,
>>>> i think i will try it too when i get windows back again, just because i
>>>> have nothing better to do lol
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Louis Kim Kline wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:55:04 -0500
>>>>> From: Louis Kim Kline <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: Re: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, maybe if it is really total mayhem, then it can be simulated 11
>>>>> meters!
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> At 07:05 PM 10/30/2006 -0600, you wrote:
>>>>>> and what, idiots running wild over everyone else?or is there some sort
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> order and rules to it?
>>>>>> i didnt look at this yet but i can just see total mayham
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Buddy Brannan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:58:00 -0500
>>>>>>> From: Buddy Brannan <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators
>>>>>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> Subject: Taking the radio out of ham radio
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not sure what the point is, but I registered to try it anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have a look at:
>>>>>>> http://www.qsonet.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Simulated radio with simulated HF bands and even simulated modes!
>>>>>>> Uh...Are we gonna have simulated bad propagation too?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV: Executive In Training!
>>>>>>> Independent Watkins Manager #361534
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shop our catalog of over 350 products for your home and health...and
>>>>>>> check out \our fabulous 2006 Holiday Gift and Entertaining Line!
>>>>>>> http://www.tastyshop.net
>>>>>>> ...And see how a Watkins business can improve your life in our free
>>>>>>> Ebook: http://www.tastybiz.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Louis Kim Kline
>>>>> A.R.S. K2LKK
>>>>> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
