Robert,

What was your question that wasn't answered to your satisfaction?

Sometimes we try to answer a question without being an expert on the subject 
in an effort to hopefully stir up discussion and stimulate the thinking 
process.

Perhaps the person who could have answered your question was absent at that 
time.

If your question isn't answered, try again, people come and go on this list 
from time-to-time.

Active discussion often solves the problem.

lighten-up and welcome back.

Howard #3, W A 9 Y B W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Clark" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 9:51 AM
Subject: Same old same old


>    This is taken from the Welcome message new subscribers receive.
>
> "This is not an attempt at censorship, but an attempt at keeping the=
> =20
> list on track relative to it's stated purposes, which are the discuss=
> ion=20
> of amateur radio in general and the blind community's participation i=
> n=20
> the hobby in particular.  I am somewhat flexible here--I will allow=
> =20
> discussion, to a point, of most anything having to do with radio and/=
> or=20
> electronics, but the primary purposes of the list remain as stated, a=
> nd=20
> should be it's primary use."
>
>    I unsubscribed some time ago because this was not respected and I=
> =20
> see its not changed. Sad for many of you could provide a wonderful=
> =20
> resource. I posted one message since I rejoined and got a half answer=
> =20
> and nothing more.
>
>    I guess I do not fit into this "club" even tho I am a ham radio=
> =20
> operator who is also blind. Maybe I will look up the definition for=
> =20
> "blind ham" later and see if I can somehow understand what it is I am=
> =20
> missing. 73,
>
> Morse Code Communiqu=E9 from
>   Robert C & Annie Yanni
> [log in to unmask] 


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com