BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:56:32 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 lines)
That is what I thought when looking at it's specs.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!


> Yes, I have one, it is much better on AM than the Crane CC plus.  I need 
> to
> learn more about it but have been doing other things.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 9:57 AM
> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>
>
>> Has anyone looked at the CCradio sw?  It seems to have very good specs on
>> am.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Kris Hickerson" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 8:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>
>>
>>>I agree, Tom.  I have both the two and the three, also.  I like them
>>> both,but the two is far superior to the three in my opinion.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have seen a couple of the C Crane radios and I'm not that impressed.
>>> I'll
>>> take the super radios over them any day.  I think the C Crane are way
>>> over
>>> priced.  When you see what GE was able to do with the two and three for 
>>> a
>>> really reasonable price and, you compare them to the C Crane radios at
>>> much
>>> higher prices, for me it is not worth it.
>>>
>>> Kris
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:23 PM
>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>
>>>
>>>>  Well, I have a 3 and a 2 here, and will use that 2 until it doesn't
>>>> play
>>>> any more!  (grin)
>>>>
>>>> And, I do think the sound of the 2 is far better than the 3.
>>>>
>>>> The base and trebble controls really make a difference on the 2, while
>>>> on
>>>> the 3, they are marginal.
>>>>
>>>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 2:11 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have a 3 here.  It's ok but from what I understand, the 2 was the one
>>>> to
>>>> have.  The Secrane radios seem  to perform well but I doubt they sound
>>>> as
>>>> good as the super radios since they don't have that big case and
>>>> speaker.
>>>> Lou
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:57 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>    Wow, that is really troubling!
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 8:29 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks the same, but far worse than the GE 3. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2