BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
matt vansomething <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:07:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (105 lines)
Oh yes, as anyone who has talked to me knows, I absolutely lov3e agrivating
people but hey, at least I have a license and operate legally


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Colin McDonald
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 12:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: icom radios

aggrevation? slander? bullying?
all because we asked for a call sign?
wow, someone is insecure.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: icom radios


> I'll have you know, that I had a lot of need to do it, as you just would
not
> shut your big gobs, and had to keep giving me aggravation.
> if you had just put a sock in it, I wouldn't have done it, so you asked
for
> it plane and simple, as I am not prepared to keep putting up with that, so
> if you want it to stop, I will with pleasure, when you lot stop giving me
> aggravation, spreading slander about me, and bullying me, it is as easy as
> that.
>
> Simon
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 6:35 PM
> Subject: Re: icom radios
>
>
> > you didn't have any need to do what you did, it was uncalled for and
> > proved
> > once and for all the truth. If in fact you are a real license holder of
> > any
> > kind, you're a disgrace to it.
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:23 PM
> > Subject: Re: icom radios
> >
> >
> >> you lot asked for it in the first place, by giving me all the
aggravation
> >> you did, so don't start whining about it now, as if you hadn't started
> >> giving it in the first place, I would have had no need to do what I
did,
> >> you
> >> lot drove me to it as well you know.
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Jim Johnson" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:23 PM
> >> Subject: Re: icom radios
> >>
> >>
> >>> agreed!!
> >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:50 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: icom radios
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> To the moderator, please get Simon off this list!  Enough is
> >>>> enough.  That language alone is enough reason!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date:
> >>>> 9/18/2006
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/450 - Release Date:
> >>>> 9/18/2006
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2