BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Blake Hailey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 May 2013 18:35:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
We have a repeater in Fort Worth on 423.975.  It is so overcrowded here that
is happening.  I have an HT that transmits down in the 420 MHZ range
Blake KA5POW


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Dshawn Pearson
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:53 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: 70 cm band question

This may be "off-topic", but it's my understanding that the 70 cm band =
plan for the U.S covers 420-450 Mhz yet, many so-called dual band =
transceivers(Kenwood tmv-71a, Icom Ic-2820h) begin their tx coverage of =
the 70 cm band at 430 Mhz.  Is there a reason for this apparent loss of =
10 mhz of this band?

73,



David S. Pearson-wa4dsp 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2