Hi David!

I'll need to look at it again, but I know I don't recall any concern when I
looked at it back during our last winter.

Using cept is one avenue, but I think I decided that it didn't apply to me
so I could discount it.

What mattered in my reading of it was it didn't matter where I was, so long
as I had a valid FCC license. 

They spend a fair amount of space in that section discussing DXCC, which is
understandable. If I made contact with VP8SPI, the location of the remote is
what counts, and not my physical location.

73,
Dave 

73,
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of David Pearson
Sent: Sunday, 31 January 2016 12:01 p.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: CEPT, and remote hams question

Hi:

The ARRL seems to feel  that in order to "control" an amateur station
governed by the CEPt agreement a ham must be physically present in the
CEPT's qth(country).If this interpretation is correct, this would severely
reduce the # of stations which may be operated by U.S hams via the
RCFORB(client) application.

Any other opinions on this?

Best regards,



David S. Pearson-wa4dsp 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com