BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Harvey Heagy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:43:30 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I'm glad they are offering that, but I don't see why we should bother with
UEB at our age.  It was just a gimmick to help the authors of Braille
translation software to make more money.  It's cumbersome, inefficient and
takes up far more space than traditional Grade 2 Braille.  It was shoved
down our throats by the 2 major so-called consumer organizations of the
blind with little input from the average consumer.  But I'm glad Duxbury is
offering that choice.
Harvey


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Tom Behler
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: changed topic, braille displays:

Harvey:

For what it's worth, I am currently using Duxbury version 11.2SR4, and it
does give me the choice between traditional grade 2 Braille and UEB.

For now, I'm sticking to traditional grade II. Braille, and will save
learning UEB as a possible retirement project on down the road.

I just don't have the time to try to master UEB  right now.

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2