BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:09:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (125 lines)
Hi Richard,

It's a  PC controlled  (USB)  swr/watt meter.    Coax sensors connect to 
the main unit which connects to the pc.     First off, if I were 
starting from scratch today, I would look  at some combonation of the 
Elecraft meter or Power Master in conjunction with the Hampod.  I've 
never used either one, but  they are options - maybe better, maybe not.

  Good things about the WN-2:
Audio readout of power  and SWR, either by it's internal voice with a 
key press, or with your screen reader.

Can be set up to disconnect an amp keying line in the event of  high 
swr.   Kind of a moot point for me, since the MFJ-998  has a similar 
feature.

Many options of sensors available  for different frequency coverage and 
power levels, from  QRP to mega QRO.

Bad points:
Software is graphical and  not blind friendly.  However once set up, 
either by trial and error or with sighted help,  things aren't so bad. 
   There are many graphs and charts and visual meters that are lost on us.
.

The tones for tuning an amp or tuner are sort of an afterthought and 
are worthless.   This is why I keep my TW-1 inline, for the audio tones. 
   The tones in the WN-2 react too slowly for practical use.   A sighted 
ham  could watch a pie chart on the screen change color as   power or 
swr changes, but the tones don't react fast enough for tuning an amp or 
tuner.

You can download the software at wavenode.com and  see how graphical it is.

There is a review from a blind perspective  at hamradioandvision.com

I've been using this for a number of years and am happy with what I 
have.  I had the original WN-1 LPT port version years before the TW-1 
came out.  however science marches on and there may be something  better 
suited today.   None of this stuff is cheap, so  do moocho research 
before  spending any money.

73, Steve KW3A




On 12/11/2015 9:23 AM, Richard B. McDonald wrote:
> Hi Steve KW3A and All!
>
> I am interested in the WaveNode WN-2 discussed below.  Frankly, I have never
> heard of it.  In particular, the WN-2's accessibility features (speech,
> tones, etc) seem nice.  I wonder if you could say a bit about 1) what sorts
> of audible speech and tone information you are able to get out of it, 2) how
> accessible the software for it is and 3) how it differs from the vaunted yet
> extinct TW-1?  As to the software, I use JAWS without Braille; so that is
> really what I mean as far as its accessibility.
>
> 73,
> Richard KK6MRH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Steve Forst
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 12:13 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Ameritron AL-80B operation
>
> Mike,
>
> I do use the TW-1 for tune up, but  find it to read low for power
> readings.     I have a Wavenode WN-2  computer controlled swr/watt
> meter.     It compares favorably with the analog meters in the shack
> (amps, and tuners), while the TW-1 always reads low.
>
> The amp is rated at 1KW SSB, 800 CW, and 500 RTTY, but  I never push it
> to the limit.     I had to replace the original tube about  a year and
> ahalf ago, with one from RF Parts.    Seems like a bit more   output
> than the original.   Can see more than a KW on most bands, but   I don't
> like the smell of smoke.
>
>
> I usually tune at 75 watts drive and  then advance the load, then reduce
> drive   to get output I want.    I was running 65 watts drive over the
> weekend to get just under 700 out on 160 CW.
>
> Any difference in drive between CW and SSB is going to be influenced by
>    stuff like microphone,  mic gain, compression, etc.   The manual
> suggests setting  up for a max key down  output of 800 watts, and voice
> peaks will be hitting the 1 K level.  Assuming you want to run everything to
> the max.
>
> I'm not sure I would drive it with 100 watts under any circumstances.
>    For my setup, even 85 seems a bit much.  If you are going to keep drive
> set at 100 watts, use of ALC might be a good idea.
>
> Mine has the grid protection board installed.    I've only had it trip a
> couple of times.  Usually at the start of a tune, if the controls
> weren't set   to the proper initial settings.
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
>
>
>       .
>
>
>
>
> On 12/8/2015 2:10 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
>> Hi Steve (KW3A)
>>
>> You run an AL-80B right? Do you use a TW-1 for readings?
>> What's the headroom like on that amp? How much drive does it take to get
> rated outputs in both CW and SSB?
>> According to the Manual, the typical drive for rated output is 85W but the
> max drive permissible is 100 plus watts.
>> Do you get these numbers?
>>
>> TNX and 73:
>> Mike DE VO1AX
>>
>> Sent from BlueMail
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2