BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
CEPT, and remote hams question
From:
David Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:01:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Hi:

The ARRL seems to feel  that in order to "control" an amateur station 
governed by the CEPt agreement a ham must be physically present in the 
CEPT's qth(country).If this interpretation is correct, this would severely 
reduce the # of stations which may be operated by U.S hams via the 
RCFORB(client) application.

Any other opinions on this?

Best regards,



David S. Pearson-wa4dsp 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2