Chris:
I could be wrong, but I think the difference is with receive filtering. For
the plain 746, you have to purchase and install any CW or SSB filters
separately, whereas the 746 pro already has them installed, and I think the
746 pro provides more filtering options than the two filter slots that exist
in the normal 746.
73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "CHRISTOPHER SCHULTE" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: 746PRO
> Just out of curiosity, what's different on the 746 pro as compared to the
> 746? I have a friend here in Muskegon that has the 746 and I was talking
> to
> him about the discussion going on here, and he was wondering what the
> difference was. That got me wondering, so I figured I'd just ask.
> *smile*
>
> 73,
> Chris, w8cjs
> Check out my web site,
> http://mysite.verizon.net/w8cjs
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: 746PRO
>
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> I've compared the receiver on my 480 with my Icom R75, and the R75 is
>> quieter, which makes the signals stand out more, especially when they're
>> weak. I also wish the 480 had a wider transmit SSB filter, which would
>> make
>> the audio a little less restricted, and I think they could have done a
>> bit
>> better with the DSP. Trouble is, it's probably the best radio on the
>> market
>> in terms of ease of operation, which is why I'm willing to put up with
>> its
>> other shortcomings. Then again, I'm not a serious contester or DX
>> chaser.
>> If I were, I'd probably want something better, and I might be willing to
>> give up some accessibility.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 23:04
>> Subject: Re: 746PRO
>>
>>
>>> Very well said, Steve, and that represents my overall assessment
>>> exactly. This is why buying a rig is often something that involves
>>> compromises, which is what makes the decision so difficult. You'd think
>>> that, for the money we pay for these rigs, you could have more
>>> all-around
>>> better features than we sometimes get.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I guess that's part of the challenge.
>>>
>>> I do have to say, though, that I've been very very impressed with the
>>> TS480
>>> so far, and I believe its receiver comes at least somewhat close to the
>>> quality of the 746 receiver, although admittedly, I'll have to play with
>>> the
>>> TS480 much more before I can conclude that for sure.
>>>
>>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 4:58 PM
>>> Subject: Re: 746PRO
>>>
>>>
>>>> Tom,
>>>>
>>>> In my opinion, Icom receivers perform better than Kenwood or Yaesu
>>>> receivers, in terms of sensitivity, signal to noise, and dynamic
>>>> range.
>>>> It's frustrating that each of the big three companies does well in
>>>> different
>>>> aspects, but none of them have radios that excel in all aspects. You
>>>> can't
>>>> beat Kenwoods for accessibility and high quality audio. Icoms have
>>>> fantastic receiver specs, but don't do as well with audio quality.
>>>> Yaesu
>>>> radios seem to have more bells and whistles than anyone else, but have
>>>> the
>>>> worst track record for accessibility, and don't seem to do as well
>>>> technically as Icoms.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
