BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 10:19:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (161 lines)
    Hey, Steve:

If I can get to the 160 meter CW contest tonight, do you know where I can 
get a list of grid squares, so that I know the QTH of any station I might 
work?

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: Small dilemma; Need some advice


> Good deal Tom,   Hope to catch you on some of the 160 contests this 
> season.
>
> Don't know if you can find the butyl rubber locally, perhaps a search on
> e-bay will turn up something cheap.
>
> Here is a link I had sent you some time ago:
>
> http://www.championradio.com/shop/Weatherproofing.6
>
>
> I've never bought anything from him, but it is run by K7LXC who has a
> tower install business in the Pacific Northwest and he also runs the
> Towertalk mailing list.
>
> My personal preference is to use silicone  self vulcanizing tape.
> (sometimes called cold fusion, or splicing tape) and then several layers
> of  3m Super 88 or 33.
>
>
> As for the pulley thing:  There has to be a way for you to get  your
> dipoles up and down by yourself.  Put your thinking cap on.
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
>
>
> On 10/22/2011 8:49 AM, Tom Behler wrote:
>>      Hey Steve:
>>
>> I know for a fact that my friend did the tape in the shingle-like method 
>> you
>> suggest.  He is a perfectionist that way.
>>
>> In the "should of" department, I can't seem to find those darn butyl 
>> sheets
>> anywhere around here in semi-rural Central Lower Michigan.  But, I'll 
>> keep
>> looking.  As for pulleys, according to my friend, pulleys don't seem
>> practical for the current 160-meter sloper arrangement.  I will gently 
>> quiz
>> him on that today, since there might still be time to make a change if we
>> want to.
>>
>> Finally, thanks for the "heads up" on the 160 meter CW contest tonight. 
>> I'd
>> have to find out my grid square, but I can certainly get on QRZ and look 
>> it
>> up, so that won't be an issue.
>>
>> Will keep you posted.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve Forst"<[log in to unmask]>
>> To:<[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 7:23 AM
>> Subject: Re: Small dilemma; Need some advice
>>
>>
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>> Like  most of the multitude, I wouldn't worry about it.  I've never been
>>> a fan of coax seal. It is a real mess when the time comes to undo it.
>>>
>>> The 3M tape you used is good stuff.   I think the only difference
>>> between the Super 33 and Super 88 is the thickness, both are rated for
>>> outdoor use.    If your friend knows what he is doing, he should have
>>> wrapped the final layer up from the bottom, towards the top.   This
>>> makes the final layer lay like shingles on a roof and  water won't try
>>> and  work it's way under each tape  seam, like would happen if the last
>>> layer were done from top down.   Either way, 3 layers of good quality
>>> tape is going to be fine.
>>>
>>> Here are a few things in the "should of" department:    Some time  ago
>>> there was a discussion of butyl rubber sheets for sealing coax outdoors.
>>>    Also some discussion of using pulleys to allow you to raise and
>>> lower the antenna yourself.  Oh, well...
>>>
>>> If your 160 antenna is up, there is a 160 CW contest tonight.Exchange is
>>> 4 digit grid square and points are based on distance between grids.  Try
>>> it out and see if it works.
>>>
>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2011 10:30 PM, Tom Behler wrote:
>>>> Hi, all.
>>>>
>>>> Well, to make a very long story short, I have decided to take my
>>>> troublesome
>>>> Carolina Windom 160 compact antenna down, and am in the process of
>>>> replacing
>>>> it with a 160-meter sloper, and an 80-meter sloper that I purchased at 
>>>> a
>>>> swap in my area last week-end.
>>>>
>>>> We are in the middle of the antenna replacement process, but I'm hoping
>>>> it
>>>> should be done by later tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> All has gone well, except for one small issue, which I'm torn about how
>>>> to
>>>> deal with.  This is the kind of issue where we've all been there when
>>>> trying
>>>> to deal with volunteer help who doesn't do things like we would.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, my friend installed the 160-meter sloper at the top of my 
>>>> 40-foot
>>>> mast, but when I asked him how he sealed the coax connection at the 
>>>> feed
>>>> point, he said that he coated the connector with a dialectric grease, 
>>>> and
>>>> then tightly wrapped three layers of electrical tape around the
>>>> connection.
>>>> The tape he used was some real good 3 M tape that I had gotten a while
>>>> ago.
>>>> I had wanted him to put coax seal on top of the tape, but he would not 
>>>> do
>>>> it, arguing that what he did should be fine.
>>>>
>>>> Obviously, my concern is that the electrical tape eventually will
>>>> deteriorate, and let water into the connection.
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to figure out a tactful way to bring up this issue again 
>>>> with
>>>> him
>>>> when he comes back tomorrow, but, at the same time, I don't want to
>>>> offend
>>>> him, since he has done so much for me already.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have any ideas as to how to tactfully handle the situation?
>>>> Obviously, if just having the electrical tape was good enough, I 
>>>> wouldn't
>>>> stress about it, but I would sure hate to be introducing unnecessary
>>>> problems into the situation here.
>>>>
>>>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2