and the size of the thing, not to mention it's turning radius. very nice 
indeed.
surely though, efficiency would suffer?
just because it's a smaller foot print and resonates properly, doesn't 
mean it will perform.


On 2/07/2009 9:51 AM, Mark went skydiving, and on the way down, shouted 
thus.:
> Hi=20
>      I wonder how well the forty meter ones work? Wow, a forty meter =
> beam I am drooling.
> 
> God bless,
> Mark
> -- Currently in Pendleton, Eastern Oregon Regional At Pendleton, Oregon =
> Clear, 84.9=B0F Wind:Variable at 5mph=20
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 6:59 AM
> Subject: Re: hex-beam
> 
> 
> I know someone who has one on a TV rotator and it handles it fine, he =
> loves=20
> the antenna.
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:52 AM
> Subject: hex-beam
> 
> 
>> Hi Steve and list:
>> I can't help but get curious about this hexbeam?  Who manufactures it? =
>  =3D
>> I am familiar with the butternut minibeam and the old, long gone =3D
>> miniquad but never ran across this one.
>> Does a light weight rotator mean a tv rotator?
>> Richard
>