BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: antenna cable
From:
Gary Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Gary Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Oct 2010 17:30:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines) 
I sure would use it if the runs weren't a total of over 150 feet or so.
you're right, cheaper and easier to use.

good luck, and keep me posted.  I'll try to help where I can.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Brennan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: antenna cable


> Yeah, Gary, I've thought about using 8 instead of 213.  I'll have cable 
> both for
> hf and uhf.  Flexibility isn't too big an issue for me, though.  The 8 
> sure is
> cheaper, though <g>.
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> signature database 5518 (20101009) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2