I agree, Tom.  I have both the two and the three, also.  I like them 
both,but the two is far superior to the three in my opinion.


I have seen a couple of the C Crane radios and I'm not that impressed.  I'll 
take the super radios over them any day.  I think the C Crane are way over 
priced.  When you see what GE was able to do with the two and three for a 
really reasonable price and, you compare them to the C Crane radios at much 
higher prices, for me it is not worth it.

Kris
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!


>  Well, I have a 3 and a 2 here, and will use that 2 until it doesn't play
> any more!  (grin)
>
> And, I do think the sound of the 2 is far better than the 3.
>
> The base and trebble controls really make a difference on the 2, while on
> the 3, they are marginal.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 2:11 PM
> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>
>
> I have a 3 here.  It's ok but from what I understand, the 2 was the one to
> have.  The Secrane radios seem  to perform well but I doubt they sound as
> good as the super radios since they don't have that big case and speaker.
> Lou
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:57 AM
> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>
>
>>    Wow, that is really troubling!
>>
>> Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 8:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>
>>
>> It looks the same, but far worse than the GE 3.