BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:20:29 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (105 lines)
well, it isn't as much bassed on price these days as it is on the reputation
of the company who has it built, and their quality controls and demanded
manufacturing standards.

So, from everything i have ever heard about LDG, their reputation in the
market, and their adhearance to high quality standards, I would venture to
guess that their talking meters are probably in the upper range of quality
and accuracy.
Now if it was MFJ who made the meter, I certainly wouldn't say it was a high
quality meter.

I'm not sure what the percentage of error on the so called top of the line
meters is.
But, i do believe it is around plus or minus 5 percent.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Martin" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: Initial Tests With My LDG TW-2


> Thanks, Colin:
>
> I know one of those persistent stories about SWR is that quote inexpensive
> meters add forward and reflected power.  I did test on a couple of antenna
> systems matched with an external tuner to 1.0 to 1.  Now wonder what price
> defines inexpensive!  Thanks.  I am having fun with the new toy.
>
> 73
> Bob Martin
>
> EchoLink Node - 55127
> Please visit http://www.wan-leatonks.net.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Initial Tests With My LDG TW-2
>
>
> > Bob:
> > I would tend to take the tw2 reading as the more correct of the two.
> > This because I have never really trusted internal power or swr meter
> > readings from the radio.
> > The tw1 and tw2 are very well made instruments and I would bet probably
> > more
> > accurate then anything inside the rig.
> > Also, one thing you must bear in mind, is that if the swr is even
slightly
> > higher then 1.1 to 1, the power reading on the tw1 and I am guessing
> > probably the tw2 as well, will be skewed slightly.
> > this could also account for the 10 percent difference.
> > 73
> > Colin, V A6BKX
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Bob Martin" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 4:31 PM
> > Subject: Initial Tests With My LDG TW-2
> >
> >
> >> Well it is here and tested.  I got it to do everything the manual and
> >> members from this list said it would.  Thanks for that assistance.
> >>
> >> The only concern I have is that it is reading about 10% different in
> > forward
> >> power level than the meter in my 746PRO and my DIAMOND SX-400.  It's
sort
> > of
> >> like having 3 watches and not knowing which is showing the correct
time.
> >> They all specify plus or minus 5 percent so if one is high in its
> >> readings
> >> and the other low, that would account for the ten percent.  I wish they
> >> agreed more closely.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >>
> >> 73
> >> Bob Martin
> >> KC3FI
> >> EchoLink Node - 55127
> >> Please visit http://www.wan-leatonks.net.
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.33/1036 - Release Date:
> > 9/28/2007 3:40 PM
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.33/1036 - Release Date:
9/28/2007 3:40 PM
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2