BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:40:32 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (44 lines)
What about the useability of the CC Radio?  Is it user friendly even?  The
only reviews I've heard on it are fromArt Bell, who as you all probably
already know is a ham and broadcaster.  What is a good and sensative AM
and FM radio that is reasonably priced other then this or the Super radio
III?





On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Will Smith wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> I couldn't disagree more about the ?Superradio!  Yes, there were some
> quality control issues with some of these radios, especially the Superadio
> 3's.
>
> But I own 3 of them and find they are all simply superb.  I can usethe
> Selectatenna with them and regularly and reliably hear AM stations up to
> 500 miles away in daytime with little noise.  Yes, I do have a very good
> location with low noise.
>
> But before issuing a general condemnation like yours perhaps you should
> consider just how many of us have so much praise for this low cost AM
> listening gem.  On FM I find it slightly above average but not
> exceptional.  and I do like it's audio quality quite well too.
>
> Will, K4SAY
> [log in to unmask]
>  On Fri, 21
> Dec 2001, Walt Smith wrote:
>
> > I own a Super Radio II and frankly, it's a piece of crap.  I recently bought
> > the RadioShack DX-399 on sale and it puts the Super Radio II to shame as an
> > AM radio.
> >
> >
> > --
> >  Walt Smith - Raleigh, NC
> >  [log in to unmask]
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2