If that is the rig I'm thinking of, it looks kind of like a stereo and 
doesn't have voice.
73
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr
open Node 3148
Las Vegas


On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, John Miller wrote:

> It may take the VS-1 but I think it's older than that even but it may be
> workable. I've never used one but if it has the tone generator, usually you
> can use that every 25 KC tone to tell where you are.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Gormley" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 3:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Today's Net Check-ins
>
>
>> Junior I don't think the ts180 can accommodate a synthesizer.  If it does
>> it
>> takes the vs2 which is no longer made.  However, you may be able to drive
>> it
>> with the Kenwood software.
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Junior Lolley" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 3:51 PM
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: Today's Net Check-ins
>>
>>> Hi, is anyone on the list familiar with the Kenwood ts180s radio?
>>> I have a older ham wanting to give me one of these radio's.
>>> I don't know anything about it any info is appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>> Junior Lolley KG4itd
>>> Liberty County E. C.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> On Behalf Of tom behler
>>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 2:10 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Today's Net Check-ins
>>>
>>>    Yeah, John. ... I hear you about the importance of having a back-up
>>> radio.
>>>
>>> I have another TS480 that I could use if my original one in the shack
>>> needed
>>>
>>> servicing, although I'd have to go out in our RV to get it.
>>>
>>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 11:46 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Today's Net Check-ins
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm glad I have a backup radio, I think if my TS-2000 ever broke and I
>>> was
>>> without it that long, I'd go nuts.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 10:46 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Today's Net Check-ins
>>>
>>>
>>>>    Gary:
>>>>
>>>> As I said earlier, Cliff will treat you well.
>>>>
>>>> Let us know what he finds the problem to be with your TS2000.
>>>>
>>>> And, most importantly, we are all looking forward to having you back on
>>>> the
>>>> net!  We miss your great signal!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Gary Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 10:16 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Today's Net Check-ins
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope to rejoin you guys on the net in a few weeks.  Clif Holland has
>>>> my
>>>> TS2000 now and he states the turn-around is about 3 weeks.  So I'm
>>>> hoping
>>>> to
>>>> be back on the air by the middle of February.  So I guess now I have no
>>>> excuse to do those things that I've been putting off.
>>>>
>>>> 73, Gary, N5GD
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>> On Behalf Of Kevin Nathan
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:23 PM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: Today's Net Check-ins
>>>>
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry you didn't make it too.  Conditions were a little interesting
>>>> but
>>>> I bet I'd have heard you big time.  George, WA8YUZ, was coming in quite
>>>> well
>>>> out here as did Junior again.  Lloyd is the strongest station but I
>>>> think
>>>> he
>>>> connected his coax to my feedline a long time ago.  <GRIN>
>>>>
>>>> Hope you got all finished.  Very 73 to you and Sue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kevin :)
>>>> Amateur Radio:  K7RX
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>> On Behalf Of tom behler
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 17:31
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: Today's Net Check-ins
>>>>
>>>>    Kevin and all:
>>>>
>>>> I want to appologize for not making the net today.
>>>>
>>>> I had every intention of being there, but had to do some class
>>>> administrative work with my assistant, and then, we had company, during
>>>> which a friend helped me troubleshoot a computer issue.  My assistant
>>>> and
>>>> I
>>>> made good progress on the class administrative stuff, but despite
>>>> several
>>>> hours of work and pulling what little hair out we have left, my friend
>>>> and
>>>> I
>>>>
>>>> were unable to make headway on the computer problem.
>>>>
>>>> Fortunately, the computer with the problem is a University computer, so
>>>> off
>>>> to the techs it will go the first of the week.
>>>>
>>>> So, again, I'm sorry I wasn't there to enjoy the festivities and do any
>>>> relaying.
>>>>
>>>> On another topic, I haven't forgotten about the possibility of a
>>>> midwest-east coast roundtable for one of the week-ends coming up here.
>>>>
>>>> I'll try to put some thoughts together on that during the coming week.
>>>>
>>>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 5:04 PM
>>>> Subject: Today's Net Check-ins
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> We had quite a good net today.  Most stations were easily heard out here
>>>> in
>>>> the Seattle metro area with little noise and no QRM to speak of.  Here
>>>> is
>>>> the list of net check-ins for your reading pleasure.
>>>>
>>>> KA1GJB, VINNY, WINDSOR, CT
>>>> WB9SLM
>>>> WA8YUZ
>>>> KD8PC
>>>> W3IUU
>>>> KW3A
>>>> KG4ITD
>>>> KK3F
>>>> KB9ZUV
>>>> K7RX
>>>> W6PR
>>>>
>>>> Very 73 to all.
>>>>
>>>> Kevin :)
>>>> Amateur Radio:  K7RX
>>>
>
>