BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Harvey Heagy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:11:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
That might be fine if employable blind people were encouraged to work, and
if we could have an equal chance at getting jobs for which we are qualified.
Harvey
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Howard Kaufman
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [bardtalk] Presidential Proclamation -- Blind AmericansEquality
Day, 2013

I don't see why their shouldn't be an earnings test, while other Americans
have one.
What we need is the guarantee of safe access to intersections, by assuring
that every car on the road make sound at the ambient level of the
environment.
How can we travel safely independently and confidently, when silent cars are
cruzing around intersections?

Yes the publishing treaty is a step forward, because access to information
is essential, and the administration was on the side of the angels on this
one.
As far as the earnings test, how about a system that will encourage all
recipients to return to gainful employment?
Insurance isn't a guaranteed income system that's not how insurance works.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2