Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:43:12 -0600 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sounds like a plan to me <g>.
Thanks for the input on this latest FS gadget.
Tom
Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Howard, W A 9 Y B W wrote:
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:30:37 -0600
> From: "Howard, W A 9 Y B W" <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: ot: pearl camera
>
> Besides the advantages Andy mentioned, your results would come a little
> faster since you don't have to wait the time for the scanner to scan the
> document. The Pearl is a digital camera rather than a scanner so the image
> is captured almost instantly. Unless these advantages are important to you,
> I wouldn't waste the money if your set-up is working. Spend the money on
> Ham gear instead!
>
> 73
>
> Howard #3
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Baracco" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:04 PM
> Subject: Re: ot: pearl camera
>
>
> > Its main advantage is that it takes up less space, and folds down to be
> > very
> > portable for use with a laptop in mobile situations, such as school or at
> > conferences.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Brennan
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7:25 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: ot: pearl camera
> >
> > Just wondering what experiences folks have had with this add on camera for
> > Open
> > Book -- is it worth the money and what can it do that a scanner can't do
> > for
> > me?
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> > web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>
|
|
|